You Are Not an Entry Level Human
There is a voice that shows up every time I consider moving in a new direction. It is not loud, it just quietly says: but you have never done that before. You are in your forties and you would be starting from scratch.
I have heard that voice many times over the past few years as I have been considering a significant career transition, and every time it shows up I have the same instinctive response. It does not feel accurate. That’s not because I have done exactly the thing I am considering - I haven’t. It’s because I have done so many things adjacent to it, and surely that counts for something. Surely the twenty years of work experience and the forty-four years of life experience and everything I have learned from relationships and challenges and mistakes and therapy and parenting and paying close attention to the world, surely all of that is worth something even when it does not fit neatly onto a resume.
This is what I want to talk about today. Not credentials, but the kind of expertise that shapes everything about how you move through the world even though it doesn’t involve a certificate of any kind.
✦
When we talk about expertise, we almost always mean credentials. Degrees, certifications, job titles, years of experience in a specific role. Things you can list and prove with information that fits onto the two-page document that is supposed to represent everything you are capable of and everything you bring to any situation.
I find resumes almost unbearable to write because the format requires me to flatten myself into a series of bullet points that capture maybe a fraction of what I actually know and can do. The corporate language, the quantified achievements, the carefully selected keywords, none of it gets at the thing I most want to communicate, which is how I think, what I notice, what I am actually good at, and why any of it matters.
And this is not just about resumes. I think it reflects a much larger and more damaging habit we have of only counting the expertise we can prove, while discounting the expertise we have simply lived.
Here is what I mean by lived expertise: It is judgment honed over time through situations that forced you to develop it, and emotional pattern recognition, or the ability to read a room or a relationship and understand what is actually happening beneath the surface. It is knowing when not to act, which is something that usually only comes from having acted too soon and paid the price for it. It is the ability to translate between people or systems, to understand why two groups are talking past each other and find the language that bridges them. It is noticing what others miss, and decision-making under pressure, and the specific wisdom that comes from having been through something hard and come out the other side with something you did not have before.
None of these things show up on a resume. All of them matter more than anything else.
✦
I have been working on something for the past several months that I want to share with you because I think (hope) it might be useful for more people than just me.
I have been gathering a set of questions, not from any single framework or methodology, but from years of watching people, thinking about the roles and rules I have lived inside, doing my own work in therapy, and noticing that the questions we usually ask about ourselves are not actually getting at what I need to know. Those typical questions tell me what I have done, but not who I am or what I genuinely bring to the table.
The questions I have been developing are organized into several areas. One is about the invisible rules you have lived inside, the unspoken codes of your childhood and your workplaces and your relationships that shaped your behavior without ever being stated directly. Another is about the cost of living by other people’s rules for so long that you lose track of your own. Another is about unlearning, or the specific moments when you realized that something you believed or the way you had been operating did not actually belong to you, and what it took to start doing it differently.
I will be honest with you about what it has been like to go through these questions myself, because I think the honest version is more useful than the polished one.
It has not produced the clarity I expected. What it has produced is curiosity and a growing recognition of patterns I had never noticed before. Some questions I sit down to answer and find myself writing for a long time and then returning days later with a completely different answer. Some questions I resist answering, which tells me something important, either because the answer feels too big and heavy to approach, or because going back to that time requires me to inhabit a past version of myself that I have not fully made peace with yet. I have noticed that the resistance itself is information. The questions that make my brain tired before I even start are usually the ones most worth sitting with.
What I have not done is judge any of it, or one tried to, which has required effort, because there is a persistent voice that evaluates whether the things I am uncovering are impressive enough, valuable enough, worth saying…embarrassing. When I noticed that I seem to create a sense of safety for people, that they tend to open up to me and tell me things, there was an immediate internal response that said: you sound like you are bragging. Do not say that about yourself.
I am trying to keep that voice out of the exercise entirely. The point is not to find things that sound impressive to other people, it is to find the things that feel natural and true and like genuine strengths I can actually show up with. The judgment about whether they are worth claiming is beside the point.
✦
Here is some of what I have found so far, and I share it not because my specific answers are what matter, but because naming them out loud might help you think about your own.
I have a familiarity with transition that has served me throughout my life - an ability to help myself and other people orient during periods of significant change or turmoil. I do not know exactly where this came from but I can see it across many different phases and contexts.
I have an instinct for connecting ideas and experiences across apparently separate domains - taking something I learned in a relationship and applying it to a work situation, or something I learned about my children and bringing it into a conversation about leadership. I can find the thread between things that do not obviously belong together. This is something I do automatically and it has taken me a long time to recognize it as a skill rather than just a habit of mind.
I have a sensitivity to power dynamics that goes deeper than titles and org charts. I notice when someone in the room is feeling diminished or unsure, even when they are not saying so, and I am comfortable stepping in to try to rebalance things to make sure everyone is on even footing in terms of how they feel and what they are getting from a situation.
None of these are things I decided to be good at. They emerged from living. But seeing them written down and clearly named, even just to myself, has changed how I show up. I feel less like I need to quickly gauge every room I walk into and perform whichever version of myself seems most appropriate. I feel more like I can simply be the person I actually am and let the room adjust to me a little.
That shift, from performing to inhabiting, is what I was hoping to find.
✦
If you want to begin thinking this way, here are a few questions to start with. Go easy on yourself, though. There is no grade for this and no one else needs to see your answers.
What do you gravitate toward naturally, when there is no expectation on your time or attention?
What drains you more than it seems to drain other people? What drains you less?
What do people consistently come to you for, even when you do not think of it as anything special?
What feels obvious to you but impressive to others?
And when you are genuinely at your best, what role are you actually playing? Not the task, not the title, but the role. Are you the translator? The stabilizer? The challenger? The one who notices? The one who holds the room steady when everything else is uneasy?
That last question has stayed with me because I think most of us have a role we play naturally that shows up across every context and relationship, but we never quite claimed it as expertise because it has always just felt like who we are.
But that is exactly what expertise is. Not something you earn in a classroom. Something you become through the accumulated weight of your own life, paid attention to.
You are not an entry level human. You came to this moment carrying everything you have ever lived through, every lesson you have ever learned, and all of it counts, whether or not it fits on a resume.
The only question is whether you are willing to see it.